Getting To Know Mikeys Mom, Mavis!

Well I actually was able to get to know Mikeys mom today, Mavis. She was born in Alaska and was there about the same time my family lived there. She also lived in Kansas and Oregon where some family members have also lived.

And what's even stranger is that she is in Mo. now, where more of my family lives.
I always knew the Delaney name sounded familiar. I just have to find the connection now. We have no Delaneys or Crook in our ancestry.

I do think I know where and why it sounds familiar but I have to pull the photo back out to verify first.

I don't know if Mikey takes after her or his father, Bruce. About the only thing they have in common is Computers, she has an Associates degree in computer science. She and I have some things in common like Photography for one.

And unlike Mikey, she isn't against Gays/Lesbians and she is not a racist from what I can tell. She enjoys knitting and loves the casinos. Did you know she did casino surveillance at one time? She knits little sweaters for her Chihuahua and she said that she knows exactly what they are for. If she's cold and sees Mavis get out one of her sweaters, she comes running and jumps up on to her lap so Mavis can put it on her.

I guess she had a weight problem back in the past. She weighed 190 at 5'-4", but started working on losing that since than.

I didn't have alot of time getting to know her, but hopefully next time. She really doesn't seem to be anything like Mikey and I don't think she agrees with his views at all.

Will He Ever Learn?

On January 5th, 2008, Sugar Ray Dodge (SRD), had his first LIVE Radio Podcast show with Michael Crook being a host on it.

I finally had a chance to listen to it, and minus the technical difficulties of hearing parts of it, I think SRD did a great job. SRD showed respect,was curteous and the callers had some great questions. Mike was pretty much flipflopping his answers. He has changed his views from the past to even more idiotic views.

I thought for sure he'd do half good as this was on radio and not where he'd be in view for people to see his fugliness, but he proved me wrong. he kept stuttering on what he was trying to say, could never find the right way of saying what his views were, and after years, one would think he'd have it down solid.

Perhaps it was due to so many people proving his views wrong, he had to change it some.

The subject of Politics came up and Crook showed his racist views. Too bad that is when the show really had technical difficulties. I hope SRD gets him back on for part ll to finish up what they couldn't.

You can listen to it at SRD Radio, Epsiode 30 LIVE and judge for yourself if Crook got owned yet again.

Thought I'd Share This...

another blog with everyone.

The un-censored Crook discussions.

The owner of that blog will let you post without editing anything. He DOES believe in Free Speech. lol ....or visit his forum about MichaelCrook

MORE:

Visit this site as well: Emily's Rant

"Partners In Crime"

Ok here is how I get the information. I know the name and I know the person died in California, but do not know where the person was born or the parents names. (In some cases I might) Sometimes though even if I put a parents last or maiden name in, it won't come up because the person in question does not have those names on the record. So if you take out the last names of parents, it may show up than. In the case with me, I than checked out for the name of the mother by putting fathers name in where it belongs with last known married name the mother had. Only ONE name showed up So I can assume that since the main person I checked for showed being born in California and died in California it was safe to assume the persons parents also may have died in California.

Click the link and choose

Deaths: 1905-2000 Scroll down to and than click the "All Searchers may enter here area."

1940-2000 Death Index Summary: Premium Search Members* may enter here.
All Searchers may enter here.

Once in there you will Just put in last name and first name of who you are trying to find. It may bring up alot or just afew or if you are not so lucky..nothing. Sometimes it will have mothers madien name and fathers last name..Other time maybe just maiden name /or just fathes names or neither name. So the name you find turns out to be born in California too.

Now go back to the main site again

This time click Births: 1905-2000

Go to: 1905-1995: Premium Search Members* may enter here.
All other Searchers may enter here.

You will need a free GuestPass. Once you get in, it will show netdetective. look to bottom right corner where it says - - - - Begin Search/Reset. Click on that than put in last name you're looking for. It will bring you up to alot of last names but you will have to hit the Next > End (Do not hit the end). you will have to hit next until you get to the name you are looking for.

The same type of info is in here as is in the death site, only it gives name of county where born.

Now how to try fnding living people.

Go to peoplefinders put in just First and last name and last known state the person was at..or you can try going by no state at all.. It will pull up every where they lived. Alias names and possible relatives. You can also than try searching the names on the list of possible Relatives. Some names I found has proven how they are connected to a person

You can also go into this site and check for familys via 1930 census or before..if someone married in Nevada in a certain year, it will show up in here.It also lists afew other states for marriages, It will show in some cases a person death place and spouses name.

Another place to find death info on someone is here. SSDI

I like to use the advance search when looking for females. If they married and you're not sure the last name. You can play around by just adding first name, month of birth (any information you know for sure) This will only work if the person had a SSN at one time, and even than, some will not show up unless you know the SSN itself. Or quite afew names may show up, and you will have to check each name. My family member did not show up by the name, but once I searched with just the SSN there, that family member came up. lol

Another nice thing about the SSDI is that you can request the actual Social Security Application by mailing it to the:

Social Security Administration-OEO FOIA Workgroup (under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. Section 552)

You can get to the application form to order by clicking on the 'SS-5 Letter' to the right of the person you searched for. Most likely anyone who died before having a SSN, you will find their info in Ancestry

And now if you noticed while going into those sites you will notice a little thing saying Ancestry.com in all but peoplefinders.

So the partner in crime in my alledged Fraud would be Ancestry. If you search further you will find that the Mormon Church owns this site, so in theory you can say they would be the ring leader of any so called crimes finding people including living ones. It gets worse though. In order for anyone to view all of the information, they charge you for it, so they are getting paid for handing out information in this alledged crime spree.

Update: I stand corrected. The owners are LDS members but Ancestry is not owned by the LDS Church.

No matter, both are good resources to use for searching ancestors,and sometimes even living relatives. Ancestry just helped me find a cousin who's family has not seen since about 1978..can you say reunion time?

He's a real tough guy!

So Crook has been emailing me trying to claim I have the wrong line, yet when I mentioned certain names and know where they live, and perhaps I may list those as well, he comes back with this:

Just remember that this game works both ways, and I will not hesitate to come after that niece you love so much...hey you come after me, I come after your family....seems only fair.

In another email:
4. Regarding kids...when it comes to revenge all family is fair game, if you mess with mine I can mess with yours, regardless of age or who really has permission to pick them up from school ;)

And another:
I don't know what your goal is, but I have no problem with revenge involving innocent kids...just keep that in mind.

Yeah, he's a tough guy alright, he threaten minor children. Anyone who wants to see the original emails let me know I'll be happy to share them.

He's Back!

It seems Crook is back. One thing that got me laughing is under the title “Indian” whiner dies, he said "But no, I’m half White and half Native-American."

If anyone remembers the past he has always claimed Dutch heritage via his VOGEL lineage. I have collected abit of info on his lines and will post it here soon to prove his lies of being HALF Native American.

SO if you are interested in his lineage, stop by again for the lines after I get it put together. I wont go too far back but enough to prove he is NOT Half Native American. Dates and places will also be included. I do have some info on the DELANEY line but have not pieced that together yet. But what I DO have may tell me the heritage of them, if not I will seek it.

UPDATE: It seem's that Crook has been trolling this blog. He made a post on his blog about this subject calling me a liar. In part, here is what he said: "I have never claimed to be half Native American, despite what this obsessed, vicious liar says. "

So I have a message for ya Crook...will you like to see the before and after screenshots where you claimed being Half Indian and than changed it to " But no, I’m half White and a very small touch of Native-American."

UPDATE: I've decided to first see how many of you peeps are good at researching ancestors. For hints, send me an email. If anyone wishes to view the screenshots of th above, send me an email.

Case Settled!

This photo was made from the video that came with the settlement from Jeff Diehl of 10zenmonkeys V. Michael Crook. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License.

Well as most of you have heard, the case between Jeff Diehl/EFF and Michael Crook has been settled. In case you have not read on that you can get the details (and view Crooks apology video) here.

If you're wondering why I am not linking the video itself her it is simple. Who would want to view something as ugly as that? That is the same reason the FOX photo has not been placed here.
I have no desire to have to view such an ugly thing each time I post on my blog.

NOTE: I changed my mind on the photos being posted here. I think it is better for others to know what he looks like.

I did however view his 'so called' apology video. First thought to me was this 'apology' is the same type he made back when he had his first anti soldier site. Except for this time, the apology was part of the settlement.If it wasn't do you really think he would apoligize?!? . In my opinion, NO!

It was funny what my 11 year old niece said when I was viewing his apology video. She said, 'That guy has some scary eyes'. lmao

I do have to comment with my opinions on some things he had mentioned either in his blog or the video's he has made (Speaking of his videos, is it just me or does his voice sound like Michael Jackson?).. Somewhere he mentioned people should respect him, they can disagree but need to respect him...sorry Crook but Respect is earned, not automatically given and your past blogs have shown NO RESPECT for others so why do you deserve it? You don't!.

On his blog he condemns people for not taking responsibility when they should. Pot..meet kettle. Let's view his admission to supposedly giving up his rights to his child. After reading some things from the settlement issue he wrote,I honestly think he is lying when he says he has given up parental rights. I beleive because prioty things came up which is one reason why he settld with Jeff Deihl and EFF is because he isn't giving up his rights but fighting to get his child back.

If he really wanted to 'give up" his parental rights, he could have just took off down to California for the court date with EFF and surely the CPS would take his rights away due to not particpating in things needing to be done to get said child back. If not that than he is trying hard to make sure not even his wife gets custody which would assure him not having to pay support for said child.

In New York, parents can sign away their righs if BOTH agree to, but if only one does but the other doesn't than i guess the one parent is in a tough bind.

Than we have his list of cowards he put on his blog. Hey Crook, have you boxed that Vet widow yet? Remember on the Steve and DC Radio interview you had, you said you'd fight a vet, but it never happened. They brought you back on and you admitted you'd get your arse kicked, but later you said you'd fight a vets widow.Has that happened yet or did you cower out with that too?
Just to refresh your memory or for others who have not heard it yet you can hear it here..

Has Michael Crook Harassed You?

10ZenMonkeys would like to hear from any of you who have been harrassed with DMCA notices by Michael Crook. Click graphic below for more information.